From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Apopka Greenhouse v. Scott

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 11, 1982
417 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AI-38.

August 11, 1982.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner.

Robert E. Bonner, Pitts, Eubanks Ross, Orlando, for appellants.

Thomas R. Mooney, Meyers, Mooney, Adler Hammond, Orlando, for appellee.


We affirm the deputy's order causally relating claimant's herniated disc to his industrial accident of September 12, 1979. Although the evidence was capable of disparate interpretations, the deputy's order determining causality was based on competent and substantial evidence. Further, even though the claimant failed to conduct a work search, the deputy's order awarding wage loss benefits is sustainable based upon the evidence of claimant's physical limitations, Dr. Shea's deposition testimony regarding claimant's inability to work, and the deputy's observation of the claimant which taken together justifies claimant's excusal from a work search.

Accordingly, the order appealed is AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Apopka Greenhouse v. Scott

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 11, 1982
417 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Apopka Greenhouse v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:APOPKA GREENHOUSE AND AETNA CASUALTY SURETY, APPELLANTS, v. HAROLD SCOTT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 11, 1982

Citations

417 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Allied Parcel Delivery v. Dixon

The adequacy of a job search is irrelevant because the deputy found Dixon "medically unable to engage in any…