From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aponte v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 25, 1992
595 So. 2d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-01151.

March 25, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Harry Lee Coe, III, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The only point raised in this appeal challenges the validity of conditions 6, 9, 10, 18 and 19 which were imposed in the written order of probation. We strike these special conditions of probation because they did not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence imposed at the sentencing hearing. Labar v. State, 584 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Affirmed, except remanded for conformance of the sentence to the oral pronouncement.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Aponte v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 25, 1992
595 So. 2d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Aponte v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS EDWARD APONTE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 25, 1992

Citations

595 So. 2d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)