From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Apollo v. Apollo

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jun 12, 2001
46 S.W.3d 664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77814

June 12, 2001

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. Hon. John A. Ross.

Susan M Hais, 100 S. Brentwood, Suite 400, Philip Edward Adams, Law Office of Hais Carmody, Clayton, MO 63105 for Respondent.

W. Morris Taylor, 231 S. Bemiston, Suite 700, Michael Kornblum, Gerald A. Sims JR., Clayton, MO 63105 Law Office of W. Morris Taylor. P.C., for Appellant.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Paul J. Simon, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.



ORDER

James N. Apollo appeals from a trial court judgment denying in part and granting in part his Motion to Modify Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. The judgment also granted in part and denied in part Donna Apollo's Counter-Motion to Modify. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, nor does it erroneously declare or apply the law. Hartzell v. Hartzell, 976 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Mo.App.E.D. 1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Apollo v. Apollo

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jun 12, 2001
46 S.W.3d 664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Apollo v. Apollo

Case Details

Full title:JAMES N. APOLLO, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DONNA APOLLO…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Jun 12, 2001

Citations

46 S.W.3d 664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)