From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Apelt v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Aug 7, 2012
No. CV-98-882-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Aug. 7, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV-98-882-PHX-ROS

08-07-2012

Michael Apelt, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.


WO


DEATH PENALTY CASE


ORDER

Before the Court is Petitioner's motion to file ex parte and under seal his lodged Motion to Supplement Budget. The lodged motion contains information protected by the attorney work-product doctrine. Consequently, the Court finds the need for confidentiality pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599(f) and will permit the lodged motion to be filed ex parte and under seal.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Seal (Doc. 321) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall filed Petitioner's lodged Motion to Supplement Budget (Doc. 322) ex parte and under seal.

___________

Roslyn O. Silver

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Apelt v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Aug 7, 2012
No. CV-98-882-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Aug. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Apelt v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Michael Apelt, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Aug 7, 2012

Citations

No. CV-98-882-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Aug. 7, 2012)