Opinion
2012-1172 2012-1173
02-16-2012
APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Apeldyn Corporation ("Apeldyn") moves, unopposed, for a 90-day extension of time to file its docketing statement; its designation of materials for the appendix and statement of the issues to be presented for review; its certificate of compliance with Federal Circuit Rule 11(d) pertaining to review of the record to determine whether protected portions need to remain protected on appeal; and its opening brief.
In a footnote, Apeldyn indicates that Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. are improperly listed in the caption, because these parties were terminated from the litigation on July 2, 2010. This footnote is interpreted as a motion to reform the caption by removing these parties.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) Apeldyn's motion for an extension of time is granted.
(2) The motion to reform the caption by removing Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.
FOR THE COURT
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: Gaspare J. Bono, Esq.
Don H. Marmaduke, Esq.
Terrence Duane Garnett, Esq.
Donald R. McPhail, Esq.
Neil Phillip Sirota, Esq.
s21