From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

APEL v. OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 18, 2007
Case No. 3:07cv159/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 18, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv159/RV/EMT.

May 18, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated May 8, 2007. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

APEL v. OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 18, 2007
Case No. 3:07cv159/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 18, 2007)
Case details for

APEL v. OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT L. APEL, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: May 18, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:07cv159/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 18, 2007)