From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aparicio v. McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2016
Case No. EDCV 15-00909-JVS (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 15-00909-JVS (DTB)

01-26-2016

FRANCISCO FLORES APARICIO, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied and that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. Dated: January 26, 2016

/s/_________

JAMES V. SELNA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Aparicio v. McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2016
Case No. EDCV 15-00909-JVS (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Aparicio v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO FLORES APARICIO, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 26, 2016

Citations

Case No. EDCV 15-00909-JVS (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2016)