From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aparicio v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 12, 2011
3:07-cv-00427-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. May. 12, 2011)

Opinion

3:07-cv-00427-LRH-VPC.

May 12, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner's motions (## 92 94) to transport prisoner and provide reasonable access are DENIED without prejudice as moot following upon the rescheduling of the evidentiary hearing. Petitioner may renew the requests in full or in part as required and/or necessary in connection with the rescheduled hearing date.


Summaries of

Aparicio v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 12, 2011
3:07-cv-00427-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. May. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Aparicio v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:HUGO APARICIO, Petitioner, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 12, 2011

Citations

3:07-cv-00427-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. May. 12, 2011)