From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anyah v. Garland

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 18, 2021
No. 20-1716 (4th Cir. Mar. 18, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-1716

03-18-2021

JEAN PAUL ANYAH, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

Danielle Beach-Oswald, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Jeffrey Bossert Clark, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jessica A. Dawgert, Senior Litigation Counsel, Giovanni B. Di Maggio, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danielle Beach-Oswald, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Jeffrey Bossert Clark, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jessica A. Dawgert, Senior Litigation Counsel, Giovanni B. Di Maggio, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jean Paul Anyah, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Anyah's merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Anyah, (B.I.A. June 5, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

Anyah v. Garland

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 18, 2021
No. 20-1716 (4th Cir. Mar. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Anyah v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:JEAN PAUL ANYAH, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 18, 2021

Citations

No. 20-1716 (4th Cir. Mar. 18, 2021)