From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anunciation v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 4, 2015
No. EDCV 14-592 JAK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2015)

Opinion

No. EDCV 14-592 JAK (FFM)

02-04-2015

MICHAEL ANUNCIATION, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition on the merits with prejudice. DATED: February 4, 2015

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Anunciation v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 4, 2015
No. EDCV 14-592 JAK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Anunciation v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ANUNCIATION, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 4, 2015

Citations

No. EDCV 14-592 JAK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2015)