From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antwine v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Sep 12, 2007
No. 09-07-267 CR (Tex. App. Sep. 12, 2007)

Opinion

No. 09-07-267 CR

Opinion Delivered September 12, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 264196.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and KREGER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On July 31, 2007, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why she needed time for filing the record. The appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Antwine v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Sep 12, 2007
No. 09-07-267 CR (Tex. App. Sep. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Antwine v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRITTNEY ANTWINE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Sep 12, 2007

Citations

No. 09-07-267 CR (Tex. App. Sep. 12, 2007)