From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antuna-Moran v. Deboo

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 1, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1318 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1318 WBS GGH P.

August 1, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Petitioner alleges that he received inadequate medical care. The purpose of a petition for writ of habeas corpus is to challenge the validity of a sentence or conviction. A federal petitioner seeking to challenge conditions of confinement, like petitioner, must file a Bivens action. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is construed as a Bivens action;

2. The petition is dismissed with thirty days to file a complaint form for a Bivens action;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the complaint form for a Bivens action.


Summaries of

Antuna-Moran v. Deboo

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 1, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1318 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2007)
Case details for

Antuna-Moran v. Deboo

Case Details

Full title:JOSE CRUZ ANTUNA-MORAN, Petitioner, v. KUMA DEBOO, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 1, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1318 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2007)