From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antrobus v. Moreland

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Mar 10, 2015
456 S.W.3d 517 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101299

03-10-2015

Richard E. Antrobus, Appellant, v. Edward O. Moreland and First Student, Inc., Respondents.

James J. Wieczorek, 1717 Park Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63104, for appellant. Thomas J. Magee, 211 North Broadway, Suite 2700, St. Louis, MO 63102, for respondent.


James J. Wieczorek, 1717 Park Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63104, for appellant.

Thomas J. Magee, 211 North Broadway, Suite 2700, St. Louis, MO 63102, for respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Antrobus appeals from the judgment entered on the jury's verdict assigning zero fault to each party and awarding Antrobus no damages on his negligence claims. Antrobus seeks plain error review of this judgment, arguing that the verdict finding zero fault by either party should not have been accepted by the trial court. We find no error, plain or otherwise.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Antrobus v. Moreland

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Mar 10, 2015
456 S.W.3d 517 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

Antrobus v. Moreland

Case Details

Full title:Richard E. Antrobus, Appellant, v. Edward O. Moreland and First Student…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Mar 10, 2015

Citations

456 S.W.3d 517 (E.D. Mo. 2015)