affirming a verdict for the lenders over the borrowers' claimed homestead exemption on the grounds of estoppel
Summary of this case from In re LiaoArgued March 4, 1935
Decided March 19, 1935
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
Terence J. Mullen and Alfred J. Amend for appellant.
Fred L. Gross for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.
affirming a verdict for the lenders over the borrowers' claimed homestead exemption on the grounds of estoppel
Summary of this case from In re LiaoIn Alexander and Prince the homestead claimants were not living on the property claimed as a homestead at the time that they allegedly disclaimed their homestead rights.
Summary of this case from In re VillarrealFull title:EMILE ANTONY, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER WILSON, INC., et al., Defendants…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 19, 1935
Thomas did not aver that he has ever resided in the cabin. The facts and issues in this case are similar to…
Prince v. North State Bank of AmarilloIt has long been the established rule in Texas that when the physical facts open to observation are such as…