From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antonio v. Ahaghotu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 1724 (D.D.C. Oct. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12 1724

10-15-2012

GUSTAVO ANTONIO, Plaintiff, v. CHILEDUM AHAGHOTU, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint.

Plaintiff brings this medical malpractice action against the urologist who treated him at Howard University Hospital. Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition, federal district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit is between citizens of different states. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). This negligence action presents no federal question, and because the parties are in the District of Columbia, plaintiff fails to establish diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

______________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Antonio v. Ahaghotu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 1724 (D.D.C. Oct. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Antonio v. Ahaghotu

Case Details

Full title:GUSTAVO ANTONIO, Plaintiff, v. CHILEDUM AHAGHOTU, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12 1724 (D.D.C. Oct. 15, 2012)