From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antoniello v. Faustina Corp.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 5304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

Nos. 2924 2925 Index No. 604511/05 Case No. 2024-00869 2024-03175

10-29-2024

Patricia Antoniello, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Faustina Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Jason Chang, New York, for appellants. Bernfeld, DeMatteo & Bernfeld, L.L.P., New York (Joseph R. DeMatteo of counsel), for respondents.


Jason Chang, New York, for appellants.

Bernfeld, DeMatteo & Bernfeld, L.L.P., New York (Joseph R. DeMatteo of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Singh, J.P., Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, Rosado, O'Neill Levy, JJ.

Appeals from orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrea Masley, J.), entered October 24, 2023, which granted plaintiffs' motion to restore the case to the active calendar, and entered May 9, 2024, which granted a motion by Vincent Santelmo and Janice Simeon-Ruddy to intervene as plaintiffs and denied defendants' cross-motion to declare the October 24, 2023 order null and void, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Plaintiff John Simeon's death almost one year before plaintiffs moved to restore this case to the calendar divested the court of jurisdiction over the proceedings until the substitution of a proper representative (see CPLR 1015[a]; Schnapp v Miller's Launch, Inc., 135 A.D.3d 655, 656 [1st Dept 2016]). Contrary to plaintiffs' contention, Simeon's claims did not extinguish upon his death under the plain language of Faustina Corporation's by-laws. Plaintiffs also do not explain how Simeon's rights "survive[] only to the surviving plaintiffs" as required under CPLR 1015(b), as plaintiffs simultaneously argue that Simeon's rights passed to his children, who were not plaintiffs at the time of the motion to restore.

Since both orders were "issued after [Simeon's] death and without proper substitution," and because no substitution has been made to date, "the appeal[s] must be dismissed as we do not have jurisdiction to hear and determine" them (Thomas v Rubin, 197 A.D.3d 1061, 1061 [1st Dept 2021]). "Since we do not address the merits of the underlying appeal[s], this dismissal is without prejudice" (Schnapp, 135 A.D.3d at 656).


Summaries of

Antoniello v. Faustina Corp.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 5304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

Antoniello v. Faustina Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Patricia Antoniello, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Faustina…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 29, 2024

Citations

2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 5304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)