From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antonie v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 30, 2022
22 Civ. 5156 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 5156 (AT)

06-30-2022

Esperancia Antoine, Plaintiff, v. Alejandio Mayorkas, Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Thomas Cioppa, District Director, New York; Ur M. Jaddou, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Merrick Brian Garland, Attorney General, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clear ly hear' and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encoiuaged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Antonie v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 30, 2022
22 Civ. 5156 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Antonie v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:Esperancia Antoine, Plaintiff, v. Alejandio Mayorkas, Secretary U.S…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 30, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 5156 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2022)