From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antonetti v. Neven

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 3, 2011
2:09-cv-001323-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. May. 3, 2011)

Opinion

2:09-cv-001323-PMP-GWF.

May 3, 2011


ORDER


In this pro se habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Petitioner has filed a notice (#37) reflecting that he received a copy of a Klingele notice but did not receive a service copy of the motion to dismiss and a transcript directed by a prior order. Review of the certificate of service on the motion to dismiss reflects service on an attorney who is not counsel in these proceedings. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that, within five (5) judicial days from entry of this order, Respondents' counsel shall file and serve an updated certificate of service reflecting proper service of the motion to dismiss and Exhibit 102 upon Petitioner. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from such service to file a response to the motion to dismiss.


Summaries of

Antonetti v. Neven

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 3, 2011
2:09-cv-001323-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. May. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Antonetti v. Neven

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ANTONETTI, Petitioner, v. DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 3, 2011

Citations

2:09-cv-001323-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. May. 3, 2011)