From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antonella v. Port Authority of Allegheny County

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 11, 2006
No. 2:03CV1753 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2006)

Opinion

No. 2:03CV1753.

January 11, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2006, after the plaintiff, Joseph D. Antonella, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion for Summary Judgment was submitted by defendant Port Authority of Allegheny County, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment submitted by defendant Port Authority of Allegheny County [Doc. No. 16] is GRANTED.

Further, it appearing that defendant William T. McArdle and defendants Robyn Gray, Paul Skoutelas, and Maureen Bertocci have also filed Motions for Summary Judgment which plaintiff has conceded are properly granted, see Doc. No. 35,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by William T. McArdle [Doc. No. 23] and the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Robyn Gray, Paul Skoutelas, and Maureen Bertocci [Doc. No. 25] are GRANTED.


Summaries of

Antonella v. Port Authority of Allegheny County

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 11, 2006
No. 2:03CV1753 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2006)
Case details for

Antonella v. Port Authority of Allegheny County

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH D. ANTONELLA, Plaintiff, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 11, 2006

Citations

No. 2:03CV1753 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2006)