Opinion
No. 2D14–880.
07-23-2014
Robert Anton, pro se.
Robert Anton, pro se.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Matthews, 891 So.2d 479 (Fla.2004) ; Phillips v. State, 128 So.3d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ; Hughes v.. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Waiter v. State, 965 So.2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; Ward v. State, 946 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; Macaluso v. State, 912 So.2d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Hurlburt v. State, 807 So.2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Anderson v. State, 779 So.2d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ; State v. Anton, 700 So.2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) ; Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) ; Clayton v. State, 904 So.2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ; Sampson v. State, 832 So.2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ; Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
ALTENBERND, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.