Anthory v. Pioneer/Mac, Inc.

Full title: STANLEY K. ANTHORY, Plaintiff, v. PIONEER/MAC, INC., Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 10, 2023

2:19-cv-00044-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-cv-00044-RFB-VCF

02-10-2023

STANLEY K. ANTHORY, Plaintiff, v. PIONEER/MAC, INC., Defendant.

LAW OFFICES OF MILES N. CLARK, LLC MILES N. CLARK, ESQ. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC GEORGE H. HAINES, ESQ. FREEDOM LAW FIRM COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF BERMAN & RABIN P.A. BENJAMIN N. HUTNICK, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT PIONEER SERVICES, SUED AS PIONEER/MAC, INC.

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Complaint filed: January 7, 2019

LAW OFFICES OF MILES N. CLARK, LLC MILES N. CLARK, ESQ. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC GEORGE H. HAINES, ESQ. FREEDOM LAW FIRM COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

BERMAN & RABIN P.A. BENJAMIN N. HUTNICK, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT PIONEER SERVICES, SUED AS PIONEER/MAC, INC.

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF PIONEER/MAC, INC., WITH PREJUDICE

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that there are no longer any issues in this matter between Plaintiff Stanley K. Anthory and Pioneer/Mac, Inc., (“Pioneer”) to be determined by this Court. Plaintiff and Pioneer hereby stipulate that all claims and causes of action that were or could have been asserted against Pioneer are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with court costs to be paid by the party incurring same.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PIONEER/MAC, INC., WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS SO ORDERED.