From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anthony v. Tennessee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 3:12-0142 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-0142

01-23-2013

MARK ANTHONY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, Respondent.


Chief Judge Haynes


ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider PAO Procedures/Habeas Relief. (Docket Entry No. 49). Petitioner's second petition for writ of habeas corpus (Docket Entry No. 43) fails to establish that Petitioner has exhausted his state remedies. Thus, for the reasons previously stated in the Court's earlier Order dismissing this action (Docket Entry No. 20), this motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

______________________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR.

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Anthony v. Tennessee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 3:12-0142 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Anthony v. Tennessee

Case Details

Full title:MARK ANTHONY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-0142 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 23, 2013)