Opinion
Civil Action 22-3382
09-30-2024
MICHAEL ANTHONY, Individually and On Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, A District of Columbia Non-Profit Organizatio Organization, Defendant.
ORDER
HON. KAI N. SCOTT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant National Republican Congressional Committee's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (ECF No. 20), Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21), Defendant National Republican Congressional Committee's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23), and after consideration of the representations made by counsel at oral argument held on May 18, 2023, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:
1. The plaintiffs claims brought pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in the First and Second Causes of Action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. The plaintiff s intrusion upon seclusion claim asserted in the Third Cause of Action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this action.