From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anthony v. Bauman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 8, 2016
Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-13312 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 8, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-13312

04-08-2016

LORENZO ANTHONY, Petitioner, v. CATHERINE BAUMAN, Respondent


OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

On December 31, 2015, this Court denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, denied petitioner a certificate of appealability, but granted petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Petitioner has now filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

This Court has already granted petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis; it is unnecessary for petitioner to again obtain permission to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Petitioner's current motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [Dkt. # 35] will therefore be denied as moot. See McMillan v. McKune, 16 Fed.Appx. 896, 897 (10th Cir. 2001).

S/Denise Page Hood

Denise Page Hood

Chief Judge, United States District Court Dated: April 8, 2016 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on April 8, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/LaShawn R. Saulsberry

Case Manager


Summaries of

Anthony v. Bauman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 8, 2016
Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-13312 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Anthony v. Bauman

Case Details

Full title:LORENZO ANTHONY, Petitioner, v. CATHERINE BAUMAN, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 8, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-13312 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 8, 2016)