From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anthony v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Dec 7, 2007
3:06cv492 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 2007)

Opinion

3:06cv492.

December 7, 2007


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the court upon the memorandum and recommendation of United States Magistrate Carl Horn, filed November 11, 2007. The parties were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), written objections to the memorandum and recommendation must be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. Plaintiff submitted an objection to the memorandum and recommendation on November 16, 2007.

After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's memorandum, the court concludes that there is no clear error on the face of the record and that the recommendation to deny Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and affirm the Commissioner's decision is correct and in accordance with law. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate are affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the memorandum and recommendation of the magistrate is hereby AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Anthony v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Dec 7, 2007
3:06cv492 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 2007)
Case details for

Anthony v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH B. ANTHONY Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Dec 7, 2007

Citations

3:06cv492 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 2007)