Opinion
November 20, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Accepting the allegations of the complaint as true, as we must on a motion addressed to the sufficiency of the complaint, we find that the plaintiff's complaint states causes of action as to the defendant's overreaching, fraud and unconscionability which, if proven, would also be sufficient to preclude an estoppel argument with respect to the plaintiff's claim seeking to set aside the separation agreement and the judgment of divorce. Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.