From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ANSONIA v. HEIN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

April, 1915.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Dowling, J., dissented.


The plaintiff has failed to sustain the burden of proof that the alterations in the lease sued on were made before signature by the plaintiff and delivery. The judgment and order appealed from must, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.


Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

ANSONIA v. HEIN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

ANSONIA v. HEIN

Case Details

Full title:THE ANSONIA, Respondent, v . EDNA VALENTINE HEIN, Now Known as MRS. NORMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1915

Citations

168 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)