From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ansley v. Wetzel

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 7, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-CV-528 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-CV-528

03-07-2022

LAWRENCE O. ANSLEY, Plaintiff v. SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Christopher C. Conner, United States District Judge Middle District of Pennsylvania.

AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of defendants' partial motion (Doc. 23) to dismiss, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Doc. 23) is GRANTED as follows:

a. The claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1985, and 1986, and the Equal Protection Clause are DISMISSED.
b. The claim for monetary damages against the defendants in their official capacities is DISMISSED.
c. The claims against defendants Ms. Shultz, Learn, Foulds, Wetzel, Marsh, McGinley, Burns, Urbanick, Kelley, Beesley, and Burd are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE these individuals as defendants in this action.

2. The motion (Doc. 23) is DENIED as follows:

a. The motion to dismiss the claims against defendants Brocca, Snedden, Weeks, and Long is DENIED.
b. The motion to dismiss the defamation claim against defendants Dunn, Stavola, and Booher is DENIED.

3. Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).


Summaries of

Ansley v. Wetzel

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 7, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-CV-528 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Ansley v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE O. ANSLEY, Plaintiff v. SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 7, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-CV-528 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2022)