From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anoruo v. Shinseki

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 27, 2012
Case No. 2:12-cv-01190-JCM-GWF (D. Nev. Nov. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-01190-JCM-GWF

11-27-2012

JOSEPH CHIDI ANORUO, Plaintiff, v. ERIK K. SHINSEKI, Defendant.


ORDER


Motion for Scheduling Order (#22)

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Scheduling Order (#22), filed on November 21, 2012. Defendant represents to the Court that its attempts to hold a Rule 26(f) conference with Plaintiff have been unsuccessful, and argues that a scheduling order is therefore now appropriate. Plaintiff shall have until December 7, 2012 to file a response to the instant Motion (#22). Absent a timely opposition, the Court shall enter a scheduling order for this litigation. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Joseph Anoruo shall have until December 7, 2012 to respond to Defendant's Motion for Scheduling Order (#22).

_________________________

GEORGE FOLEY, JR.

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Anoruo v. Shinseki

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 27, 2012
Case No. 2:12-cv-01190-JCM-GWF (D. Nev. Nov. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Anoruo v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH CHIDI ANORUO, Plaintiff, v. ERIK K. SHINSEKI, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-01190-JCM-GWF (D. Nev. Nov. 27, 2012)