Opinion
September 27, 1955.
Order unanimously reversed and the motion for a stay denied. The application for a stay should not have been made to a Justice of the Supreme Court at Special Term. The plaintiff was not entitled to a stay of an order for temporary alimony under the provisions of sections 615 and 594 of the Civil Practice Act. Those sections apply to judgments or orders for the payment of a sum of money only. Temporary alimony orders do not fall in that category. Settle order on notice.
Concur — Peck, P.J., Cohn, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ. [See Finkelstein v. Finkelstein, post, p. 965.]