From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dietz v. S.K.V., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 2010
73 A.D.3d 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2885.

May 25, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered November 18, 2009, which granted defendants' respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied as moot the part of defendant Madison/64th Properties' motion that sought, in the alternative, summary judgment on its common-law and contractual indemnification claims against the S.K.V. defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Zalman Schnurman, New York (Marc H. Miner of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

Thomas D. Hughes, New York (Richard C. Rubinstein of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Gannon, Rosenfarb Moskowitz, New York (James A. Aldag of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.


The Building Code provisions relied upon by plaintiffs do not apply to the subject staircase ( see Reyes v Morion Williams Associated Supermarkets, Inc., 50 AD3d 496, 497-498; Gaston v New York City Hous. Auth., 258 AD2d 220, 223). Nor did defendants have notice of any dangerous condition that would otherwise give rise to liability on their part ( see generally Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836).

We need not address Madison's appeal from the denial of the purely alternative relief of summary judgment on its claims for indemnification.

[Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 32703(U).]


Summaries of

Dietz v. S.K.V., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 2010
73 A.D.3d 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Dietz v. S.K.V., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANNY C. DIETZ et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. S.K.V., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 25, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4457
900 N.Y.S.2d 865

Citing Cases

Radparvar v. Vitucci

In so declaring, we make no finding as to whether plaintiff is entitled to money damages arising from the…

Radparvar v. The Estate of Vitucci

In so declaring, we make no finding as to whether plaintiff is entitled to money damages arising from the…