From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Annabel v. Frost

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 16, 2022
3:14-cv-10244 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 16, 2022)

Opinion

3:14-cv-10244

08-16-2022

ROBERT ANNABEL, Plaintiff, v. JACK FROST, et al., Defendants.


Robert H. Cleland District Judge

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO ECF No. 308 (ECF NO. 310)

ANTHONY P. PATTI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff requests an extension of time for replying to ECF No. 308, Defendants' response to his renewed motion in limine (ECF No. 294) due to mental health issues and a change of address. The motion is GRANTED (ECF No. 310) and his reply brief filed on August 15, 2022 (ECF No. 308) is HEREBY ACCEPTED AS TIMELY.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Annabel v. Frost

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 16, 2022
3:14-cv-10244 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Annabel v. Frost

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ANNABEL, Plaintiff, v. JACK FROST, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 16, 2022

Citations

3:14-cv-10244 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 16, 2022)