From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ann P. v. Nicholas C.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 2007
44 A.D.3d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-02195.

October 9, 2007.

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the mother and the Law Guardian separately appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Foskey, J.), dated February 3, 2006, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition and vacated a temporary order of protection issued against the — father.

Ralph R. Carrieri, Mineola, N.Y., for Petitioner-Appellant.

John M. Zenir, Mineola, N.Y., Law Guardian for the child, Nonparty-Appellant pro se.

Jay C. Shoulson, Long Island, N.Y., for Respondent-Respondent.

Before: Miller, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record supports the Family Court's determination that the mother failed to prove, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the father committed acts which would constitute the offenses of harassment, disorderly conduct, or stalking against the daughter ( see Matter of Patton v Torres,

38 AD3d 667, 668; Matter of Thomas v Thomas, 32 AD3d 521, 521; Matter of London v Blazer, 2 AD3d 860). The majority of the events relied upon to support the petition occurred three years earlier and were not "relatively contemporaneous" ( Matter of Thomas v Thomas, 32 AD3d at 521; Matter of Ashley P., 31 AD3d 767, 769; Swersky v Swersky, 299 AD2d 540, 541; Yoba v Yoba, 183 AD2d 418, 418).


Summaries of

Ann P. v. Nicholas C.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 2007
44 A.D.3d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Ann P. v. Nicholas C.P.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANN P., Appellant, v. NICHOLAS C.P., Respondent. JOHN M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7704
843 N.Y.S.2d 406

Citing Cases

Jose M. v. Tatianna T

In Matter of Thomas v Thomas ( 32 AD3d 521), the Court reversed a Family Court finding that events that took…

In the Matter of Maria Aruti v. Aruti

A family offense must be established by a fair preponderance of the evidence ( see Family Ct. Act § 832;…