From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ankeney v. Creany

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02085-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02085-WJM-MJW

11-04-2011

RANDAL ANKENEY, Plaintiff, v. DR. TIM CREANY, NURSE PRACTITIONER KLENKE, and NURSE PRACTITIONER HIBBS, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Compel Continuing Discovery (Docket No. 153) is denied.

In this motion, plaintiff seeks a court order compelling the defendants to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) and to supplement their discovery with his "medical file and the results of Dr. Creany's [recent examination] [which] must be disclosed to [plaintiff], as must any and all documents relating to the denial of Dr. Creany's recommendation." (Docket No. 153 at 2, ¶ 7). Defendants correctly note in their response (Docket No. 156), however, that the plaintiff's medical file is available for his personal inspection. See CDOC Administrative Regulations 950-02 and 950-05 (attached as exhibits to Docket No. 152). Therefore, this court finds that defendants need not supplement their discovery with the requested materials.


Summaries of

Ankeney v. Creany

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02085-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Ankeney v. Creany

Case Details

Full title:RANDAL ANKENEY, Plaintiff, v. DR. TIM CREANY, NURSE PRACTITIONER KLENKE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 4, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02085-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 4, 2011)