From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ankeney v. Creany

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02085-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02085-WJM-MJW

02-24-2012

RANDAL ANKENEY, Plaintiff, v. DR. TIM CREANY, NURSE PRACTITIONER KLENKE, and NURSE PRACTITIONER HIBBS, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion/Petition for Permission to Appeal (Docket No. 182) is denied as moot in view of plaintiff's filing of a Notice of Appeal (Docket No. 181). It is further

ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Retention of Record (Docket No. 183) is denied. The Clerk of the Court will transmit an electronic record on appeal in accordance with the Tenth Circuit's local rules. The plaintiff will receive correspondence from the Clerk of the Court when such action is taken. If plaintiff requires a copy of any of the documents electronically transmitted (which he should already have as they would be documents already filed in this action), he may request a copy from and remit the requisite payment to the Clerk of Court. It is further

ORDERED that the Motion for Clerk to Prepare Record (Docket No. 184) is denied as unnecessary. The Clerk will transmit the electronic record in due course.


Summaries of

Ankeney v. Creany

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02085-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Ankeney v. Creany

Case Details

Full title:RANDAL ANKENEY, Plaintiff, v. DR. TIM CREANY, NURSE PRACTITIONER KLENKE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 24, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02085-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 24, 2012)