From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anjum v. Shams-Ul-Qamar

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 11, 2022
No. 04-21-00586-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2022)

Opinion

04-21-00586-CV

07-11-2022

Hamzah ANJUM, Appellant v. Zeenat SHAMS-UL-QAMAR, Appellee


From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-CI-24053 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellee's brief was due by July 7, 2022. On July 5, 2022, appellee filed a pro se motion requesting an extension of time and appointment of appellate counsel. The next day, appellee filed another pro se motion requesting a sixty-day extension of time to file her brief. After consideration, we grant appellee's request for an extension of time and order her brief due by September 6, 2022. However, we deny appellee's request for the appointment of counsel. See Aguilar v. Aguilar, No. 02-11-00370-CV, 2012 WL 6632526, at *3 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth Dec. 21, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.) (recognizing no right to appointed counsel in protective order proceeding).


Summaries of

Anjum v. Shams-Ul-Qamar

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 11, 2022
No. 04-21-00586-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Anjum v. Shams-Ul-Qamar

Case Details

Full title:Hamzah ANJUM, Appellant v. Zeenat SHAMS-UL-QAMAR, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Jul 11, 2022

Citations

No. 04-21-00586-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2022)