From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anhalt v. Englander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1938
254 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

June 17, 1938.


Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the causes of action set forth are barred by the Statute of Limitations affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.


Plaintiff's right of action arose out of the contract determining the respective rights of the parties to the sum in question and at the time the money was paid over to defendant in accordance therewith and with plaintiff's acquiescence. Plaintiff does not allege that this contract was the result of fraud nor does he seek to rescind it. The contract defines the rights and obligations of the parties and is the basis upon which plaintiff seeks recovery. ( Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co., 276 N.Y. 259.)


Summaries of

Anhalt v. Englander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1938
254 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Anhalt v. Englander

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN J. ANHALT, Respondent, v. JOSEPH ENGLANDER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)