From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anglo-Continental Chemical Works, Ltd. v. Dillon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 1906
111 App. Div. 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

March 9, 1906.

Archibald C. Shenstone, appellant, in person.

Edmund L. Mooney, for the respondent.

Present — O'BRIEN, P.J., PATTERSON, INGRAHAM, LAUGHLIN and CLARKE, JJ.


The appellant has been the attorney of record in this action for the defendant Maclagan since the commencement of the action. The order here appealed from was granted upon the motion of the defendant Maclagan, the granting of the order evidently being based upon the absolute right of a party to change his attorney, as no misconduct on the part of the appellant or cause for the substitution is shown.

That a party has the absolute right to change his attorney is without question in this State. Under rule 10 of the General Rules of Practice, however, the rights of the attorney should be protected where no misconduct is shown, and this requires that when an attorney has rendered services and has received no compensation therefor, a substitution should not be granted without protecting his lien. The application of the rule requires, in the present case, that a reference should be ordered to determine the amount due the attorney, the latter to be allowed to retain the papers until the amount due him is determined and paid; that part of the order, however, which directs substitution to stand.

The order appealed from should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.


Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Anglo-Continental Chemical Works, Ltd. v. Dillon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 1906
111 App. Div. 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

Anglo-Continental Chemical Works, Ltd. v. Dillon

Case Details

Full title:THE ANGLO-CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL WORKS, LIMITED, Respondent, v . JAMES ST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1906

Citations

111 App. Div. 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
97 N.Y.S. 1081