From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Angelotti Chiropractic, Inc. v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 12, 2013
Case No. SACV -1139-GW(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. SACV -1139-GW(JEMx)

11-12-2013

ANGELOTTI CHIROPRACTIC, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTINE BAKER, et al., Defendants.


Judgment Under Rule 54(b)

For the reasons given in the Court's "Tentative Ruling" on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Claims provided to the parties on November 4, 2013 (see Docket No. 49), as well as for the reasons stated on the record at the hearings conducted on November 4 and 7, 2013, the Court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to some (but not all) of the Plaintiffs' claims and as to some (but not all) of the Defendants in this action. The Court determines that there is no just reason for delay and therefore directs entry of final judgment as to the following claims and parties, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b):

In so finding, the Court notes that it also granted Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which is immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1).

1. As to COUNT I of the First Amended Complaint (Violation of the United States Constitution, Amendment V, Takings Clause), judgment shall be entered in favor of all Defendants and against all Plaintiffs;

2. As to COUNT II of the First Amended Complaint (Violation of the United States Constitution, Amendment XIV, Due Process Clause), judgment shall be entered in favor of all Defendants and against all Plaintiffs.

3. As to COUNT IV of the First Amended Complaint (Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983), judgment shall be entered in favor of all Defendants and against all Plaintiffs only insofar as Count IV raises a claim under the Due Process Clause or the Takings Clause. In all other respects, no further judgment is entered with respect to Count IV.

4. The Court further directs that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants Christine Baker and Ronnie Caplane and against all Plaintiffs as to all remaining counts in the First Amended Complaint. No further judgment is entered as to Defendant Destie Overpeck except as noted in Paragraphs 1-3 above.

______________________

United States District Court

Central District of California

Los Angeles Division


Summaries of

Angelotti Chiropractic, Inc. v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 12, 2013
Case No. SACV -1139-GW(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Angelotti Chiropractic, Inc. v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:ANGELOTTI CHIROPRACTIC, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTINE BAKER, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. SACV -1139-GW(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2013)

Citing Cases

Chorn v. Brown

) On November 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued a…