Opinion
859.
04-19-2016
In re Jaci ROBERT B. A., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Kobi R., Respondent–Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.
Law Office of Cabelly & Calderon, Jamaica (Lewis S. Calderon of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jeremy W. Shweder of counsel), for respondent. Karen Freedman, Lawyers for Children, Inc., New York (Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.
Law Office of Cabelly & Calderon, Jamaica (Lewis S. Calderon of counsel), for appellant.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jeremy W. Shweder of counsel), for respondent.
Karen Freedman, Lawyers for Children, Inc., New York (Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.
FRIEDMAN, J.P., ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, KAPNICK, WEBBER, JJ.
Opinion Order, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about January 30, 2015, which, after a fact-finding hearing, determined that respondent mother derivatively neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A preponderance of the record evidence demonstrated that the mother posed an imminent danger of harm to the subject child, based on the prior orders finding that she had neglected and derivatively neglected her other children, by admitting that she was aware that her paramour had sexually abused one of her children, but continued to be involved with him (see Matter of Keith H. (Logann M. K.), 135 A.D.3d 483, 24 N.Y.S.3d 35 [1st Dept.2016] ).
The instant petition was filed less than one year after the Family Court's finding of neglect as to the subject child's older siblings, and thus the prior findings of neglect were sufficiently proximate in time to the instant proceeding (see Matter of Noah Jeremiah J. [Kimberly J.], 81 A.D.3d 37, 42, 914 N.Y.S.2d 105 [1st Dept.2010] ).
The finding of derivative neglect as to the subject child was also appropriate because the mother's previous behavior demonstrated such an impaired level of parental judgment as to create a substantial risk of harm for any child in her care. The mother's failure to plan apart from her partner, and her noncompliance with her service plan demonstrate that she failed to take appropriate measures to address the issues that led to the prior neglect findings, and “her inability to acknowledge her previous behavior ‘supports the conclusion that she has a faulty understanding of the duties of parenthood sufficient to infer an ongoing danger to the subject child’ ” (Matter of Keith H., 135 A.D.3d at 484, 24 N.Y.S.3d 35 ; see also Matter of Jasmine B., 66 A.D.3d 420, 420, 886 N.Y.S.2d 162 [1st Dept.2009] ).