From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ane v. Whitaker

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 3, 2019
No. 18-1702 (4th Cir. Jan. 3, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-1702

01-03-2019

SENY ANE, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, Respondent.

Melissa J. Mitchell, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL A. SUHR, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melissa J. Mitchell, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL A. SUHR, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Seny Ane, a native and citizen of Senegal, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board's order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c)(2) (2018). We therefore deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Ane (B.I.A. May 29, 2018).

We lack jurisdiction to review the Board's refusal to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen and, therefore, dismiss this portion of the petition for review. See Lawrence v. Lynch, 826 F.3d 198, 206-07 (4th Cir. 2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir. 2009) (collecting cases). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART


Summaries of

Ane v. Whitaker

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 3, 2019
No. 18-1702 (4th Cir. Jan. 3, 2019)
Case details for

Ane v. Whitaker

Case Details

Full title:SENY ANE, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 3, 2019

Citations

No. 18-1702 (4th Cir. Jan. 3, 2019)