From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andujar v. McGinnis

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 30, 2006
Civil Action No. 9:03-CV-0108 (LEK/DRH) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 9:03-CV-0108 (LEK/DRH).

January 30, 2006


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on September 24, 2004, by the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York.

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. In the interval of at least fifteen days since the Magistrate Judge filed the subject Report-Recommendation, no objections to it have been raised. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Andujar v. McGinnis

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 30, 2006
Civil Action No. 9:03-CV-0108 (LEK/DRH) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Andujar v. McGinnis

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ANDUJAR, Petitioner, v. R. McGINNIS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jan 30, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 9:03-CV-0108 (LEK/DRH) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2006)