From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andujar v. Lenox Hill Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 1996
226 A.D.2d 179 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 11, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Luther Dye, J.).


Plaintiff's medical malpractice and wrongful death claims, which are founded in tort and are premised on JIB's vicarious liability for the negligence of its employees or agents, are not preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) since the claims do not implicate the administration of the ERISA-qualified plan itself ( Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, 57 F.3d 350 [3d Cir], cert denied ___ US ___, 116 S Ct 564; Pacificare of Okla. v. Burrage, 59 F.3d 151 [10th Cir]; see also, Lupo v. Human Affairs Intl., 28 F.3d 269 [2d Cir]). We have considered JIB's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Andujar v. Lenox Hill Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 1996
226 A.D.2d 179 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Andujar v. Lenox Hill Hospital

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS ANDUJAR, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of DEBBIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 179 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 532

Citing Cases

Tufino v. New York Hotel

Thus, the claim is of a type not preempted by ERISA and the complaint should not have been dismissed. (…

Blaine v. C.H.P

ERISA's preemption of State law and common-law claims relating to any "benefit plan" ( 29 U.S.C. § 1144 [b]…