From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andros v. Tinsley

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Feb 7, 2024
7:23-cv-135 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2024)

Opinion

7:23-cv-135 (WLS)

02-07-2024

JOHN ANDROS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STEPHEN TINSLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

On February 2, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (Doc. 13) (“Amended Complaint”). Therein, the Plaintiffs attempt to incorporate by reference “the allegations contained in their Original Complaint, Doc. 1.” It is the practice in this District that an amended complaint must include all allegations and causes of action asserted against defendants and such amended complaint replaces the original complaint rather than supplementing the plaintiffs' allegations and causes of action.

Accordingly, on or before Wednesday, February 14, 2024, the Plaintiffs shall refile the Amended Complaint including all allegations and causes of action Plaintiffs assert against Defendants.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Andros v. Tinsley

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Feb 7, 2024
7:23-cv-135 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Andros v. Tinsley

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ANDROS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STEPHEN TINSLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Feb 7, 2024

Citations

7:23-cv-135 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2024)