From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrillion v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 31, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0761 DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0761 DAD P.

May 31, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 10) is denied.


Summaries of

Andrillion v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 31, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0761 DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Andrillion v. People

Case Details

Full title:KURT DINESO ANDRILLION, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 31, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0761 DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 31, 2011)