From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Oct 3, 2016
1:16CV1187 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2016)

Opinion

1:16CV1187

10-03-2016

LAYMOND L. ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. SGT. WALKER, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, submitted a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants used unnecessary force against him and discriminated against him. For the reasons explained below, this action should be transferred to the Western District of North Carolina.

The statute for determining venue in the present case is 28 U.S.C. § 1391, which reads in pertinent part:

A civil action may be brought in--

(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located;

(2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or
(3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.
28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

Here, all named Defendants are employed in the Western District of North Carolina, and it appears that the events or omissions giving rise to the claims also occurred in that District. Thus, venue is not proper in the Middle District, but is proper in the Western District of North Carolina. Moreover, the Court has discretion to transfer this action to an appropriate district under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) or 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). See, e.g., Saudi v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 427 F.3d 271, 277 (4th Cir. 2005); In re Carefirst of Maryland, Inc., 305 F.3d 253, 255-56 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, and in the interest of justice, this case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina for further proceedings.

In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be transferred to the United States District Court for Western District of North Carolina.

This, the 3rd day of October, 2016.

/s/_________

Joe L. Webster

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Andrews v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Oct 3, 2016
1:16CV1187 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Andrews v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:LAYMOND L. ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. SGT. WALKER, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Oct 3, 2016

Citations

1:16CV1187 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2016)