From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Suter

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 26, 2008
No. 05-5342 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 26, 2008)

Opinion

No. 05-5342.

Filed On: February 26, 2008.


ORDER

Upon consideration of the February 2006 motion to hold this case in abeyance pending resolution of a petition for an extraordinary writ filed in the Supreme Court, the October 2006 motion for appointment of counsel, and appellant's statement in his February 2007 motion for appointment of counsel that the October 2006 motion is moot, it is.

ORDERED that the February 2006 motion to hold this case in abeyance be dismissed as moot. See In re Andrews, 546 U.S. 1169 (2006) (denying petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition). It is.

FURTHER ORDERED that the October 2006 motion for appointment of counsel be dismissed as moot.


ORDER

Upon consideration of the trust account report and the consent to collection of fees, it is.

ORDERED that, pursuant to appellant's consent to collection of fees, appellant's custodian is directed to pay on appellant's behalf the initial partial filing fee of $20.15, to be withheld from appellant's trust fund account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The payment must be by check or money order made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Appellant's custodian also is directed to collect and pay from appellant's trust account monthly installments of 20 per cent of the previous month's income credited to appellant's account, until the full $255 docketing fee has been paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Such payments must be made each month the amount in the account exceeds $10 and must be designated as made in payment of the filing fee for Case No. 05-5342, an appeal from Civil Action No. 05-1173. A copy of this order must accompany each remittance. In the event appellant is transferred to another institution, the balance due must be collected and paid to the Clerk by the custodian at appellant's next institution. Appellant's custodian must notify the Clerk, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, in the event appellant is released from custody.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt and to the Clerk, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The Clerk is further directed to send to appellant's custodian a copy of this order and appellant's consent to collection of fees.


Summaries of

Andrews v. Suter

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 26, 2008
No. 05-5342 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Andrews v. Suter

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Andrews, Appellant v. William Suter and Troy D. Cahill, Appellees

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 26, 2008

Citations

No. 05-5342 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 26, 2008)