From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 21, 2015
168 So. 3d 223 (Fla. 2015)

Opinion

No. SC15–183.

04-21-2015

Robert Lee ANDREWS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Opinion

To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus, because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000). To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). Any motions or other requests for relief are also denied. No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court.

PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Andrews v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 21, 2015
168 So. 3d 223 (Fla. 2015)
Case details for

Andrews v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert Lee ANDREWS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 21, 2015

Citations

168 So. 3d 223 (Fla. 2015)