From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 12, 2016
NO. ED CV 16-0090-RGK(E) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2016)

Opinion

NO. ED CV 16-0090-RGK(E)

10-12-2016

DALRAY KWANE ANDREWS, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's "Request for Judicial Notice, etc." is denied as moot; and (2) Judgment shall be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice. ///

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: October 12, 2016

/s/_________

R. GARY KLAUSNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Andrews v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 12, 2016
NO. ED CV 16-0090-RGK(E) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2016)
Case details for

Andrews v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:DALRAY KWANE ANDREWS, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 12, 2016

Citations

NO. ED CV 16-0090-RGK(E) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2016)