From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Huber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01366-MSK-KLM (D. Colo. Jun. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01366-MSK-KLM

06-19-2012

WAYNE ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. ROXY HUBER, Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Reconsideration of Motion for Rule 54(b) Certification [Docket No. 66; Filed June 15, 2012] (the "Motion"). As an initial matter, the Motion does not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A., which provides as follows:

The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter. The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule.
The Motion is subject to denial on this basis alone. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#66] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Andrews v. Huber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01366-MSK-KLM (D. Colo. Jun. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Andrews v. Huber

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. ROXY HUBER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 19, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01366-MSK-KLM (D. Colo. Jun. 19, 2012)